Lauryn Hill Quietly Settles Foreclosure Over $1 Million Tax Debt (Exclusive)

Written by on March 15, 2019

R&B Singer Saves Family Home From Seven Figure Tax Suit

Lauryn Hill has saved her New Jersey mansion from foreclosures with the aid of quietly settling her home’s almost $1 million tax debt, Sugar Water TV has learned.

The “Can’t Take My Eyes Off You” singer has come to an agreement with the realty corporation that had foreclosed on her home and was gunning to get her out, according to court docket papers.
Last year, we exclusivelypublished Rothman Realty LLC sued the hip-hop singer to foreclose her mansion after the employeroffered the tax certificate on her suburban mansion.

According to the suit, Hill didn’t pay the taxes on the property again in 2003, and plaintiff Rothman Realty LLC bought the tax lien and started out paying the tax bills, which swelled to a whole of $993,901, in accordance to court papers receivedthrough BOSSIP.

The “Killing Me Softly” singer neverspoke back to the foreclosures suit, so Rothman Realty obtained a decide to formally place Hill in default and put the home in foreclosure, courtroom papers state. The realty companydesired Hill out of the mansion and the completeownership of the property. The homewas once even set to be offered at Sheriff’s auction, with the proceeds used to pay Rothman Realty back, in accordance to court papers.

But remaining month, Rothman Realty asked the decide to push aside the case, due to the fact the corporation and Hill had been able to make a deal backyard of court. Lawyers for the realproperty agencysaid in courtroom papers that the count numberwas “amicably adjusted,” on the other hand did now notdetail what the phrases of the contract were.

Hill offered the 5,000 square foot mansion in South Orange for $430,000 in 1997 – at some stage in the top of her repute with the Fugees, according to public records. The property, set on half an acre, is now really worth an estimated $1.06 million.

Hill’s attorney declined to remark on the case.

3/5 (1)

Please rate this

Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Current track